Agree 100%. It's an SUV for goodness sake's. I get on the freeway and able to pass other vehicles just fine for what I have. I guess you have to look at the age of the person that wants to do this. Specially if these cars are re-sold again, I would not want to be the person that would buy it, knowing that it was altered.Why would so many want to void their powertrain warrany? A tune certainly would do that. I have a WRX, and was willling to take that chance, but on an SUV?
You are all over the place! (KN_TL)Keep emailing Ktuner not hondata!! SPAM SPAM SPAM
I understand. Certainly Honda would not tune the CRV for maximum power and performance from the factory. However, why would they not tune it as close as possible for "driveibilty" and MPG? And again, how much more driveibilty and MPG is worth loss of your power train warranty on a new vehicle?It's not purely for performance reasons. Drivability can be improved and other events can be addressed which were all done in the name of mpg.....
Honda's CR-V powertrain engineering team probably left 20-40 hp, 5 mpg, 10% wider power band, and 50,000 miles of CVT reliability on the table with the stock tune. I mean, why would they have optimized it for the best overall combination of those elements right out of the factory? Would they have put in hundreds of thousands of test miles and thousands of hours of analysis to provide optimal mix from the factory? Nah. They probably got 80% of the way there and decided to go home and crack open some beers. Why push the envelope, they said. Good enough, why bother. Leave some low hanging fruit for the aftermarket guys to make a few bucks. The Honda engineers are probably hacks anyway.I understand. Certainly Honda would not tune the CRV for maximum power and performance from the factory. However, why would they not tune it as close as possible for "driveibilty" and MPG? And again, how much more driveibilty and MPG is worth loss of your power train warranty on a new vehicle?