Once again you’re not seeing the big picture Mr Dark Knight ..it’s not the labor of pushing a button twice be serious it’s a matter of going into a higher mode and turning all your electronics on just to turn off the lower mode , there’s no reason for that .it’s a flaw get it? But it is what it is MoveOn!
Thanks all , no mas!
Actually, the electronics systems in the vehicle may actually want to be fully cycled on the power up stages before being turned off and going back into sleep mode. A particular software program assumption or dependency might actually require it. I say this because when you turn your vehicle off... not all electronics systems shut down all at once, or in the same manner, or even in the same order each time. If you were to watch the power bus after you shut down, you can observe that it actually takes several minutes before every system is moved to it's low power standby state.
These modern vehicles are as much complex electronics as they are complex mechanical systems. Keep in mind.. theses systems and how they are powered up and down are actually operating on the instructions from one or more system computers that are coded by software engineers. If you know know anything about how software coding and engineering works.... it makes dependency assumptions (just like many hardware systems do) as to how they power up, inter-communicate, and power down.
Given that all the various systems in the gen5 CRV share a common bus, and communicate with one another, it is reasonable to assume that if you begin a partial startup (ie put the vehicle in accessory mode), the most bug free method of sequencing them back down is to NOT leap from step 1 to step 3... and skipping step 2. Well written software would not care and would cover all the possible owner induced corner cases, but it is nearly impossible to cover every possible variation and so predictable subroutine driven power up and power down sequencing would be a software engineering best practice for large volume consumer products (of which a CRV happens to be one).
Note: I am not defending Honda's approach here, only acknowledging that these systems are complex, with lots of inter-dependencies, and generally random sequences if allowed on the part of owners may produce needless issues that result in taking vehicles in for service for "some flaky problem" that cannot be reproduced at the dealer. None of us know the inter-dependencies that Honda grappled with during design, nor are most of us sensitive to the fact that more and more electronic systems in these vehicles are now actual 3rd party systems not even produced by Honda... and subject to specific sequencing of operation, including power down and communication with other subsystems across the common bus.